قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / NewTech / Apple received a legal strike when Qualcomm was awarded $ 31 million by the jury

Apple received a legal strike when Qualcomm was awarded $ 31 million by the jury



  Qualcomm Headquarters-3

Apple and Qualcomm are in a heated lawsuit.


James Martin / CNET

Apple has violated three Qualcomm patents and should pay the chip maker $ 31 million for violating its technology, a jury on Thursday said, adding momentum to the chip maker when it launched another lawsuit with the iPhone next month Manufacturer.

Qualcomm, The lawsuit was filed in July 2017. Apple allegedly used its technology in some versions of its popular iPhones without permission. The jury awarded Qualcomm the full amount requested at the beginning of the two-week trial in San Diego .

A controversial Qualcomm patent covers a technology that allows a smartphone to quickly connect to the smartphone Internet as soon as the device is turned on. Another is concerned with graphics processing and battery life. The third technology deals with a technology that shifts the traffic between the app processor and the modem of a phone.

$ 31 million in losses is a decline for Apple, which has shrunk to $ 1 trillion last year. However, it is an important win for Qualcomm, which is recognizing its reputation as a mobile component innovator. The win also adds credibility to the view that the company's innovations are reflected in the iPhones.

The ruling sets the stage for a highly anticipated process between the two companies, scheduled for next month in San Diego. The quarrel over Qualcomm's patents with Apple is worth billions of dollars and will be a crescendo in the far-reaching legal history of technology giants.

The dispute between Apple and Qualcomm began two years ago when the Federal Trade Commission accused Qualcomm, with the support of Apple and Intel, of being a monopoly on fashion chips. The FTC argued that Qualcomm's royalties prevented competitors from entering the market and that telephone prices rose. The trial took place in January and the parties are currently awaiting a decision.

The study next month will also review Qualcomm's licensing business.

Thursday's patent proceeding, chaired by US District Judge Dana Sabraw, is more technical and less prominent than the other parts of the litigation. Nevertheless, this could affect how your phone is made and how much it costs.

The General Counsel of Qualcomm, Don Rosenberg, praised the decision.

"Today's unanimous jury verdict is the latest victory in our worldwide patent litigation, which blamed Apple for using our valuable technology without paying for it," he said. "The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others have enabled Apple to enter the market and become so fast.

Apple said it was" disappointed "with the verdict." Qualcomm's continued campaign for patent infringement claims is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from the major issues that confront her with investigations into her business practices in US federal and international law, "said a spokesperson.

The Both sides spent much of the court hearings -up patent: Apple argued that one of its engineers, Arjuna Siva, had made important contributions to the technology and had to be patented, according to Qualcomm, the idea was stolen as the two Companies Collaborated to Bring Qualcomm's Chips The process took a notable turn last week when Siva, who now works for Google, apparently resigned from the show then the decision t has undone estify on Monday .

The Jury suppressed Apple's argument that Siva should have been named as the inventor.

Apple argued that the trial was not just patents. During [19459216] closing arguments on Wednesday Apple lawyer Juanita Brooks said the "true motivation" for the lawsuit was a retaliation for Apple, which put Intel on the market as the second chip maker in 2016. She said Qualcomm was upset because the two companies had previously done so an exclusive relationship since 2011.

Now, Intel has completely replaced Qualcomm on iPhones.

"Qualcomm went into a drawer, wiped some old patents and threw them against the wall to see if they would stay." said. Qualcomm lawyer David Nelson said, "We have the right to get back our intellectual property."


Source link