قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Innovative / Can Apple comply with Apple's privacy advertising?

Can Apple comply with Apple's privacy advertising?

The thing that shook the internet for much of yesterday was Reuters's report that Apple decided against throwing away its keys for users' encrypted iCloud backups after the FBI found out encryption had weighed down.

after ”does a lot of work in this wording – it reads like it's supposed to be a cause, but it could just be a chronology. Reuters itself did not come out and said Apple chose to keep the ability to unlock your iCloud backups because they were concerned that the FBI might freak out if it did it blocked, but did not say that either did not . A source told the outlet that "Apple didn't want to poke the bear," the bear is the FBI.

The news is not that the iCloud gap exists ̵

1; we always knew that. If Reuters' reporting is correct (and I have no reason to doubt it), Apple's rare U-turns are on the rise to protect your data.

There has been a stir due to the broader context that the Attorney General accused Apple of refusing to assist in FBI investigations, which Apple strongly denies. But this rejection also contains the unpleasant fact that Apple can access this data at all via the iCloud gap.

Apple has become the epitome of privacy last year. I would argue that Apple's own privacy and security rhetoric meant that anything less than perfectly private and secure data would be considered a failure. And friends: There is no such thing as absolutely private and secure data.

To put it bluntly, Apple is really doing a lot to restrict the collection and distribution of your data – that is one of the core problems of the big browser war that I wrote about last week. It also has the edge in terms of encryption on the device. Other large technology companies should do more to follow Apple's example in device encryption and tracking. Credit where due.

Speaking of where credit is due – and I'm embarrassed to say that I forgot until John Gruber mentioned it – Google offers full backup encryption that is not available on its servers for newer Android phones can be. (If only it offered a safer standard messaging experience!)

Anyway, this whole story was everything anyone in engineering spoke about yesterday (until the Bezos phone hack story arrived. As I said , There is a lot going on! ). My favorite tweet about the whole fight comes from Joe Cieplinski, who puts the whole debate in the right context:

I think it's great that the non-tech world thinks Apple supports terrorists and technology The world also thinks Apple is selling us to the FBI. I have to love the complete absence of reason in our discourse these days.

I don't know if there is a complete absence of reason, but the truth is that data protection and encryption are actually pretty complicated actually. As much as we want it to be a simple binary choice between safe and not, the truth is that security is a spectrum. You compromise every time you choose a password, you have the least chance to remember it. Apple compromises when it decides to keep the decryption key for iCloud backups.

The last time Tim Cook spoke directly about this issue that I know of, he said Apple kept the keys for users who forgot their passwords. This is a legitimate use case, and whether you believe it is the main reason or not is between you and your general confidence in Apple and in big tech in general.

Incidentally, this debate took a long time. It was already one of those things that the technicians knew about but didn't think much about when Walt Mossberg wrote about the "iCloud gap" in his column for The Verge in 2016. It was a vaguely worrying thing in 2016. Now in 2020 it's a much bigger story because Apple itself made it the story of the iPhone.

When you put up a giant billboard at America's largest consumer electronics show that touts that "what's happening on your iPhone stays on your iPhone" like Apple did at CES in 2019, they want Folks that you do it justice. If you post a privacy notice in May, people expect you to comply. The heat on this topic is largely high because Apple's own rhetoric was so vocal.

It may sound like I'm insulting Apple for hypocrisy. I am not yet. As mentioned earlier, data security is a spectrum and it is difficult to understand how everything works. If I'm dissatisfied with Apple about anything, it's because I'm so absolutist about data security and privacy.

And I get the impetus! Placing a billboard that says, "Every security and privacy decision comes with compromises, and we'll make the best possible choices in that regard without locking your phone so you can barely use it" won't do much good for phones. This is not how marketing works.

What's next? I expect a lot of patience from Apple (for example, it did not respond to our request for comment). However, I don't know how long it can just be silent. The FBI and the Attorney General will definitely continue to exert pressure. I doubt that Apple's big tech rivals struggle with it the same way Apple does, but that doesn't mean Apple's users won't have better demands.

Apple's selection for iCloud backups involves compromises that sensible people can argue about. I don't know if I agree with them (actually I don't think so), but it would be nice to have an open, differentiated discussion about them. The problem is that, as Cieplinski tweeted, nuances and reasons for discussions about encryption are pretty scarce.

More stories from The Verge

Exclusive look at Cruise's first driverless car without steering wheels or pedals

Andrew Hawkins looks inside (forgive the pun) on GM's entry into the discussion of self-driving Cars. In particular, don't miss the video.

Inside are two opposing benches, two screens at both ends … and nothing else. The lack of all of the things you expect to get into a vehicle is worrying. No steering wheel, no pedals, no gears, no cockpit, no obvious way for a person to take control if something goes wrong. It smells like a new car, but it's not uncomfortable. It's almost like cucumber-infused water.

Microsoft's CEO looks to a future beyond Windows, iOS and Android small summits in New York last week. This quote from CEO Satya Nadella is really something:

“Windows with its billion is good, Android with its 2 billion is good, iOS with its billion is good – but there are 46 billion more. So let's look at what these 46 billion plus 4 [billion] look like and define a strategy for it, then leave everything under the sun. "

The Saudi Arabian prince allegedly hacked Jeff Bezos & # 39; cellphone with malicious WhatsApp message

Google advocates the temporary ban on facial recognition because Microsoft

James Vincent has recently been pushing facial recognition back and forth. Here's an idea: what if we set technology policy through a democratic system in which our properly elected representative was involved, rather than what these companies thought was best for their image. Weird, I know.

So far, the market has actually dictated the rules, with large technology companies taking different positions on the subject. Microsoft sells facial recognition, but it has its own limits, for example, that the police are allowed to use the technology in prisons but not on the street and not to sell it to immigration authorities. Amazon has been eagerly seeking police partnerships, especially though critics say its video ringtones give law enforcement agencies access to a massive crowded surveillance network.

SpaceX successfully tests the escape system on new spacecraft – while a missile is destroyed [19659035] Loren Grush has all the details, including this part of Elon Musk who knows how to make a good quote:

But Musk said the Crew Dragon could have survived if it had been right on the fireball. "Since the spaceship has a very strong base heat shield, it shouldn't be significantly affected by the fireball," Musk said. "It could literally look like something from Star Wars, where it flies straight out of the fireball." Musk also noted that the crew dragon was able to escape as it did at any time during the ascent to orbit.

Meet the 26-year-old socialist trucker running for congress on TikTok

Great profile of Makena Kelly! Most of the time, however, I will laugh for days at the phrase "you rich".

] Sonos and Tile Execs warn Congress that Amazon, Google and Apple are killing the competition

Adi Robertson's story about one of the most exciting hearings I've seen in quite some time. I know it has nothing to do with impeachment or statements from major tech CEOs, but if you are interested in the consumer tech ecosystem at all, be careful. At the very least, I recommend looking at some of the surprisingly clear opening statements from all of these companies – any one could be instantly deleted by Amazon, Google, or Apple, and these giant companies may not even notice that they did. The certificate starts here at around 45 minutes.

Things that are not modular and things that

Sonos will stop providing software updates for its oldest products in May

Speaking of which, Sonos is a tough but necessary call. The fact that the system is not updated beyond what the oldest speaker on your network can handle is a mystery. Maybe that won't be a limitation in the future. I made a joke on Twitter about how this is an example of why the lack of modular gadgets is short-sighted. But it's not a joke. All attempts to do this on the cell phone have basically failed – some even so much (macaw!) That they have given consumers the whole idea of ​​what a shame.

Skate downhill 27 miles an hour with a Dot electric

Super fun video with Becca Farsace. This board looks really cool and modular (at least 2020 can be something!). It's great to mix and match parts to find what suits your needs. … The fact that it cannot brake when the battery is full is not that big.

Skip pulls back the curtain on the high costs of maintaining electric scooters

Modularity! It turned out to be a bad idea to convert a series of scooters that were originally designed for easy, personal use into heavy ridesharing. It's a good thing that Skip ensures transparency, and we hope that these things will become more permanent over time.

"It is still early and we cannot yet estimate the long-term effects of 4,786 spare parts per million trips. Some parts have to be replaced due to wear and tear and aging of the vehicle fleet," says the company. "So far, however, all parts have been faulty caused by vandalism or premature material defects. "

Source link