When Canon announced its first mirrorless full-frame camera in the EOS R, there was great excitement. But only making one camera was a bit of a head scratch as all the other two released at the same time. Nikon brought two versions of its mirrorless platform in the Z6 and Z7, as well as Panasonic with the Lumix S1 and S1R. In addition, the EOS R does not have the specifications, the resolution or the video chops to really satisfy the professionals, while the price of $ 2,300 (just for the body) sales of newcomers or amateurs who upgrade wish, difficult. However, with the introduction of the new 26.2 MP EOS RP, the full mirror Master Master Plan from Canon makes a lot of sense.
The EOS RP not only offers one of the most compact bodies that you can get from a full-frame camera (it's actually smaller and lighter than a Rebel T7i), but starting at $ 1,300 (just for the case) This is certainly the best deal in this category. The only mirrorless full-frame cameras that even come close to being the price are the original Sony A7 from 2013 for $ 800 and the slightly newer A7II from 2014 for $ 1,000.
You also get a 26.2 MP full-frame sensor with just one sensor The resolution of the EOS R is slightly lower than that of the 30.3-MP values. It features the same Digic 8 image processor, a fully rotating touch screen on the back, and the dual-pixel auto-focus technology found in other Canon cameras. The two key features not offered by the new EOS RP are the touch-sensitive ribbon (which few people really like) and the secondary top-mounted display for fast ISO and battery life.
All photos in this slideshow were taken with the EOS RP and were not edited, except that they were cropped to 1920 x 1080.
What You Get Is A Shockingly Good Score A value that costs 90 percent of the EOS R skills for $ 1,000. At 1.07 pounds (with SD card and battery) and 5.22 x 3.35 x 2.76 inches, the EOS RP is even smaller than a Sony A7III. Thanks to her deeper grip she is much more comfortable in the hand. One drawback to the compact design of the RP, however, is that people with larger hands can dangle their little fingers on the bottom of the camera, though this can easily be addressed with a $ 80 handle extension.
My bigger complaints with the RP are so in the R there are a few things that do not seem to be fully optimized. An example is the wheel on the left, which is reserved exclusively for turning the camera on and off. It seems like it might be better to do two things as a rotation speed selector or as an ISO dial, two functions that would otherwise take a few clicks in different menus to set.
I also wish that the EOS RP d-pad was set to control the camera's focus point selector. This means you'll inevitably have to rely on RP's 3-inch touchscreen until you feel like you're spending some time searching through tight lists of settings to activate something that should be turned on by default.
That is, many potential Problems with buried settings are mitigated by the system In addition to the shutter button, the multifunction key of RP and the Q-menu of Canon, you can access important things such as measurement, autofocus type, image quality, etc. with one touch.
The Other Thing I Want Before we know what it's like to actually shoot with the new EOS RP is the Electronic Viewfinder. In most situations it works fine. In bright light, however, I sometimes noticed that the flat eyecup often incident more light than I would like, which occasionally led to the OLED EVF with 2.36 million points a little restrictive felt.
However, when you start taking photos Almost all of these little annoyances fade quickly. The combination of a compact body and a large full-frame sensor results in an affordable camera that exceeds expectations. In low light, shooting at ISO 6,400 has low noise, while shooting in bright light across the map is sharp and colorful.
Compared to a Nikon Z7 with $ 3,400, the EOS RP showed something blurred at the edge of the frame and a little less dynamic range. However, it is hard to get annoyed that there is a $ 2,000 difference in price between the two cameras.
A small worry is that Canon is targeting the new and entry-level photographers with the EOS RP, fully automatically, with Canon's algorithms tending to be too aggressive if you want to increase the ISO sensitivity of the camera. In low light, this can cause photos to appear grainy than they really need to be. Although, in a sense, this only adds to the need for a better understanding of how your equipment works.
Another peculiarity has struck me that the Canon Eye AF with switched focus tracking is still not as reliable as the Sony mirrorless competitors in full format. The persecution often feels a bit erratic, so the camera usually snaps quickly when shooting with the head, but if the person turns his head slightly, the camera tends to return to general face recognition.
If you're more into shooting animals, Canon's focus tracking is reasonably adept at focusing on your subject. When I came across a flock of birds, I just tapped one on the back of the EOS RP and let the camera do its thing. The big advantage of this is that you can focus much more on framing and composition after setting up the focus. The only time I noticed a lot of drifting was when I was trying to capture an inconspicuous object like a faraway door or a window.
With the focus exposure range, Canon added a brand new feature to the EOS RP. The setup is pretty easy. All you have to do is turn on the function, tell the camera how many pictures to take, select a shutter, and then press the shutter button. From there, the camera takes a series of photos, with the focus point adjusted slightly each time.
The hard part follows next, because once you've got a collection of images, you'll have to mess around with Canon's editing software and stack them into a final composite. It's a great trick. I just wish that Canon, as the camera is aimed at beginners and amateurs, has an option to stack images into the camera.
As far as video is concerned, the EOS RP is equally well-informed, though it still rolls a bit even with relatively slow pans. This can cause straight vertical lines to appear bent. The EOS RP is also a curiosity in video resolutions, as it can record 4K video at 24 frames per second, but at a setting of 1080p only 30 or 60 frames per second. Weird.
The only drawback is that the battery of the EOS RP was relatively mediocre. Under normal conditions, with a time split between the EVF and the rear touch screen, I exhausted the EOS RPs after 190 frames while shooting JPEG and RAW images. Another ten or so one to two minutes long videos were mixed. This is a little less than the EOS RP's CIPA rating of 250 beats per charge, but since some time has been spent playing around in settings, Canon's claim seems about right.
Unfortunately the EOS RP like the EOS R offers no stabilization in the body. You would opt for Nikon's Z-camera or a Sony A7III. But here is the thing. For a $ 2,300 camera, that's a big sticking point. With a $ 1,300 camera, this omission is suddenly much less offensive. In a way, this really adds up to the EOS RP as a whole.
With only $ 1,300, the EOS RP brings the best in the mirrorless full-frame camera, such as. Excellent image quality, compact dimensions and elegant autofocus functions, for example, can be afforded at a price that is interesting for new and amateur photographers. Canon announces six new RF lenses, developed before the end of 2019 for mirrorless full-frame cameras. The currently limited selection of native lenses is therefore no longer an issue. And although I was allowed to play around with the EOS RP for just one day, it already feels like one of the best examples of why we should be interested in the new generation of mirrorless, large sensors.
The Canon EOS RP will be available for $ 1,300 (body-only) in March, along with a free lens adapter (for non-RF Canon glass) and extended grip, or as part of a kit with EF24 Available -105mm kit for $ 1,700 or a RF 24-105mm lens (this is the same kit lens that you get with the EOS R) for $ 2,200.