IBM's Project Debater, an AI system that can engage in live debate with people, today faces the grand finalist of the 2016 World Debating Championships and European debate champion Harish Natarajan 2012. The debate went it's about preschool cost subsidies. Project Debater argued for it and Natarajan argued in opposition.
More than 50 percent of the audience at the Yerba Buena Center for Art in San Francisco said in a poll that was made after the debate Debater enriched their knowledge on the subject, while about 20 percent said the same argument by Natarajan.
The two seemed to draw when there was a rethink in the audience: 17 percent of viewers after the debate The movement changed its mindset and 1
The competition took place before IBM Think, a conference held in San Francisco this week.
Natarajan and Debater were informed 15 minutes in advance about the topic of the debate. The participant received a total of eight minutes to share an opening argument, a refutation and a two-minute closing argument.
Debater argued for pre-primary education because it can benefit the impoverished students and reduce their crime rates, citing a wide range of sources, including the National Institute for Early Education Research and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ,
Doing what man considers morally right was an essential part of the debater argument and refutation.
"Giving the unfortunate a chance is a moral obligation for every human being," Debater said after asking if her opponent (Debater is a woman, said the Creator) would prefer the poor on his doorstep. 19659002] "It's basic human decency," Debater said in terms of well-being. He called it exactly as if he were helping someone who had fallen.
Natarajan, for his part, argued that Pr school support could be better spent elsewhere to help the most deprived, and these grants are aimed primarily at a political handout for the middle class.
Debater and Natarajan had never spoken before the debate. By comparison, when Project Debater debuted in a series of arguments last summer, Natarajan had no experience with the AI system.
Debater is trained by billions of sentences from newspaper articles, Wikipedia topic pages and other sources of knowledge. The Watson Conversation KI was used as part of the process of converting speech to text.
The Battle of Project Debater is today the most recent human-machine competition driven by artificial intelligence.
Following the founding of AlphaGo and the defeat of World Champion Lee Sadol, DeepMind continues to develop systems that beat human professionals in games such as Starcraft II.
Last week, the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence introduced AllenAI, a system that works with a human in a game like Pictionary. The goal of this system is to learn how to work with a human, but the future Turtest will be tested in the Turing test to see if people can tell if they're playing with a human or a machine.
Last fall, autonomous drone systems joined the Drone Racing League, and AWS ran an autonomous race competition for its DeepRacer car last fall.
The debate was moderated by John Donovan, presenter of Intelligence Squared.
Intelligence Squared Receives Updates on Project Debater IBM Research Director Dario Gil has been explaining VentureBeat for years in a telephone interview.
As in the show, viewers were asked to vote on the winner of the debate, and which page influenced their opinion.
Intelligence Squared has a role in Project Debater because profit or loss is not so much the focus, it's more about helping people with valuable dialogues to help them develop their thinking.
Bater is the only way you will debate. "It has its pros and cons, the machines that debate, and people do, but the question is that they argue differently, they use facts differently. enriching for us Does it add something to the conversation? "