Reference device aside, this one are The kind of specs we’ll see at some point in popular ultraportables like the XPS 13 and the ASUS ZenBook, so I thought it was worth an early look. Although I was encouraged to rate the reference notebook, it’s still a very early model so I couldn’t do battery tests or take photos of the interior. The system didn’t feel like a prototype, however, with a sleek metal case and design accents. It weighs about 3 pounds and has a 1
I started the 3DMark benchmark first because I really wanted to see Intel’s top performing Xe graphics in action. And it wasted no time impressing me. In the Sky Diver benchmark, 14,684 points were achieved, which corresponds to over 2,000 points more quickly than the XPS 15 from Dell with a Core i7-8750H CPU and the dedicated GPU GTX 1650 Ti from NVIDIA. Not bad Intel!
If this reference laptop actually shipped, it would compete directly with a system like the XPS 13 that was also used in Skydiver. The XPS 13 got 9,502 points, while last year’s Core i7-1065G7 CPU ran with integrated Iris Plus graphics. When I saw this 5,000 point difference with Intel’s Tiger Lake system, I ran the 3DMark benchmark several times to confirm the high score. Each result was well over 14,000. In the graphics, Tiger Lake is clearly a beast.
I noticed that while playing too Overwatch In 1080p with low graphics settings, I saw between 50 and 70 frames per second. That’s more than fast enough for smooth (and dare I say entertaining) gameplay. By comparison, last year’s fastest Ice Lake CPUs – which were already a big leap from Intel’s earlier integrated graphics – typically hit around 40 to 50 FPS. The Tiger Lake system even managed 45 to 70 FPS with medium graphics settings. Personally, I would take the easy hit there for a more lush environment. It hit 30 to 60 FPS on the high setting – an impressive feat, but a bit too choppy to be playable. The big snack? You can expect to play many demanding games without the need for a dedicated GPU.