قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Technology / New questions to Facebook when it came to data harvesting technology

New questions to Facebook when it came to data harvesting technology



Facebook faces explosive new questions as to when executives knew Cambridge Analytica's misuse of user data, a year after the first outbreak of the scandal. Prosecutors investigate that the social media giant has hidden the extent of its data relationship with the company.

The Observer has also learned that a Facebook board member and confidant of its CEO Mark Zuckerberg met Christopher Wylie, the whistleblower of Cambridge Analytica, in the summer of 201

6 as well as the data company began his work for the Trump Campaign.

Facebook repeatedly refused to say when its executives, including Zuckerberg, learned how Cambridge Analytica had harvested millions of people around the world to address them with political messages without their consent. Silicon Valley insiders, however, reported Observer that Facebook board member Marc Andreessen, the founder of venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and one of the most influential people in Silicon Valley, attended a meeting with Wylie, which took place in Andreessen Horowitz took office two years ago, before he appeared as a whistleblower.

It marks the end of one of the worst weeks in the history of Facebook. News of further criminal investigations and departing officers outweighed the shocking revelation on Friday that an armed man who had killed 49 people in prayer in New Zealand had killed the massacre on Facebook. In the following hours, Facebook and Google failed to stop the footage. Hundreds of thousands of people watched the video.

But the observations of Observer on Facebook open new perspectives A years-long scandal that raises questions that reach down to board level.

People who attended the meeting with Wylie and Andreessen claim it was set to find out what Cambridge Analytica did to Facebook's data and how the technologists could help fix the problem. It is unclear in which capacity Andreesen Horowitz hosted and who weakened the meeting, but it is nevertheless a most embarrassing revelation for Facebook, which turned out to be the subject of a criminal investigation last week Cambridge Analytica.

Important Events in the Series about the Company for Policy Data Analytics

December 2015

The Guardian reports that Cambridge Analytica, a political data company, supported Ted Cruz's presidential campaign, and suggested that the Republican candidate use psychological data based on research by tens of millions of Facebook users to gain an advantage over its political rivals [19659011] 2019

June 2016

Cambridge Analytica, the political advisory firm whose vice president is Steve Bannon, joins forces with Facebook and Google to start working with Trump campaign helper Brad Parscale in San Antonio. Two months later, Donald Trump dismisses Paul Manafort as his campaign manager and appoints Bannon. The campaign spends $ 6 million on Cambridge Analytica services.

17. March 2018

Christopher Wylie, co-founder of Cambridge Analytica, claims in the Observer and the New York Times that the company had harvested 50 million Facebook profiles in a major data scandal. This number was later corrected by Facebook to 87 million. Wylie claimed that the data sold to Cambridge Analytica was then used to develop "psychographic" profiles of people and provide them with online material.

21. March 2018

After four days of rejecting a statement, Mark Zuckerberg publishes a Facebook post apologizing for the breach of privacy. The Facebook CEO responds to the ongoing impact of the data scandal and says, "We have a responsibility to protect your information, and if it does not, we do not deserve to serve you, I've been working on what exactly to understand and how to ensure that this does not happen again "

25. March 2018

Zuckerberg publishes full-page ads in a series of British and American newspapers to apologize for a "breach of trust."

25. April 2018

Facebook publishes its first earnings report since the scandal was reported. Quarterly sales were the highest for a first quarter and the second highest

May 2018

Wylie Appears in Front of the US Congress to Answer Questions About the Scandal.

Cambridge Analytica goes into administration. Days later it is reported that the FBI and the US Department of Justice are investigating the company

July 2018

The British Information Commissioner's Office announces that Facebook is to pay a fine of $ 500,000 ($ 663,000) for data breach, as Facebook "violates the law by disclosing the information Does not protect people ".

119 billion dollars are being cut off Facebook's share price as Zuckerberg announces that many users are leaving the platform.

November 2018

Mark Zuckerberg, who had refused repeated invitations to appear before the British parliamentary inquiry into false news, is "depleted" at a special committee meeting by members of nine national parliaments.

March 2019

It is reported that the US Department of Justice is conducting a criminal investigation into Facebook's data exchange with other technology companies.

Northern California prosecutors are investigating Facebook's allegations that they did not know about the abuse of Cambridge Analytica from Facebook data until it was told by a Guardian reporter New York Times reported on Friday. "We work with investigators and take these probes seriously," said a Facebook spokesman for the New York Times (19459004).

Andreessen is one of the most influential figures in Silicon Valley and was an early investor on Facebook. During the period in 2016, when Facebook announced the investigation of data breaches by Cambridge Analytica, Christopher Wylie was invited to a meeting at Andreessen Horowitz.

Wylie, the young Canadian data scientist, would continue to emerge the scandal in Observer a year ago. He then revealed how Cambridge Analytica worked with a Cambridge University researcher, Aleksandr Kogan, to collect Facebook data from users without their consent, to model their personality and politically attack them.

A Silicon Valley Technologist Who Knows The Meeting At Andreessen, Horowitz said, "There were people who were very worried about what reports Cambridge Analytica was doing with data, and the meeting was set up to talk about as much as possible Find out the exploit to find possible solutions. That's why Wylie was invited. They wanted his knowledge. He was asked, among other things, about the company's contacts with Russian companies.

It is known that a Facebook group was formed in which Wylie was a member, and it is believed that Andreessen remained in contact with Wylie. Observer broke the story of his involvement in March last year.

A Valley insider attending the meeting said, "The strange thing is that there was no follow-up. The idea was to reverse the problem in order to find solutions. However, we have never heard of follow-up on the Facebook security team or attempts to put the information into action.

Andreessen Horowitz declined to answer the questions of Observer . Facebook has repeatedly refused to report to members of Congress and the British Parliamentary Counterfeit Intelligence Agency when executives learned of the data abuse. She also refused to answer the questions of Observer .

A spokesperson said: "Facebook was unaware of the data transfer from Kogan / GSR [Kogan’s business Global Science Research] to Cambridge Analytica until December 2015. On Facebook When we learned of Kogan's violation of Facebook's privacy policy, we took action.

In another twist, Kogan told the New York Times on Friday that he intends to sue Facebook for defamation for alleging he has vilified the deception of companies about how he wanted to use the data. A spokesman for Facebook described the lawsuit as "frivolous".

Damian Collins, chairman of Parliament's fake intelligence agency, said: "Facebook refused to say which leaders knew what when, and they never explained whether the data was destroyed or where it went.

" Last year After the end of the story, there was an in-depth investigation to find out what other developers had access to data, including companies like Palantir, and it never came in. It's hard not to be suspicious, why it's so evasive. "

David Carroll, an American professor who prosecuted Cambridge Analytica for not telling him what personal information he had about him, said it was important to know who and what "Why is Facebook obscuring?" he said. "We know that Facebook will face Joseph Chancellor, Kogan's business partner, before the Guardian's first report . It contradicts the belief that nobody knew anything. Zuckerberg's replies to Congress are unbelieving. It is unbelievable that we do not know one year later, and we still do not know these basic facts. "

Carroll's own fight with Cambridge Analytica has reached a critical point tomorrow. He is in the Supreme Court against the administrators of Cambridge Analytica to defend themselves against the dissolution of the companies. Carroll is concerned about the extent to which the administrators have concealed the true nature of their relationship with Emerdata, the company's successor, and the true purpose of the winding-up attempt. "You have done everything possible to prevent me from being sent my data. It's exactly how Facebook does it. They seem desperate to give up the truth. "The administrators deny the allegations and pursue their attempts to liquidate Professor Carroll and resist the attempt to remove them.

Ravi Naik, the lawyer of Carroll, who received the Law Society's Award for Human Rights Lawyer of the Year for his work on the case, said it was an important moment in his fight to find out the truth about the data Cambridge Analytica has saved.

"Facebook has tried not to tell the truth with these evasive answers to lawmakers. And Cambridge Analytica has tried bankruptcy. We know that there was this very toxic data dump that was used to attack people politically, but we still do not know where this data came from and how it was used. We are still completely in the dark. This is an attempt to break this vault. "


Source link