A rare victory for environmentalists breaks the controversial Keystone XL pipeline after a federal judge signed Trump's presidential license last year. The reason of the judge? The permit disregards "inconvenient facts", including the impact of the pipeline on the climate.
Former President Barack Obama refused to build this pipeline in 201
Whoops, this keystone pipeline release was twice what everyone thought
Remember the big Keystone pipeline in South Dakota last year? Well, it turned out that it …
Read more Read
The possibility of an oil spill was one of the questions of US District Court Judge Brian Morris with the Keystone XL. Unsurprisingly, Trump and his administration halved their environmental analyzes in the crude oil pipeline, so Morris asked them to make a supplement to the 2014 Keystone XL Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which "provides an updated modeling of potential oil spills and recommended risk mitigation implies measures "as set out in the 54-page court order.
Perhaps more importantly, it has commissioned the addition to the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from the energy project on climate change, pointing out that the administration has not" Reasoned explanation "provided" For the conclusion that the impact of Keystone XL on the climate would be unimportant When Obama killed the project, greenhouse gas emissions had everything that had to do with it President can undo previous policies, but the court He decided that Trump must give a good reason.
As the Order explains, the effects of Keystone XL's climate change under Obama were taken into account:
The Department acknowledged the support of science's need to maintain global temperature below two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels … The Department further acknowledged scientific evidence that human activities are a dominant cause of climate change. … The department cited transboundary impacts including storm surges and intense drought. … And finally, the ministry accepted the impact of the US as the world's largest economy and second largest greenhouse gas emitter.
Trump's call to investigate the climate impact of a pipeline project is almost a joke to Trump's skepticism about science on climate change, but there you have it. New surveys on cultural resources also need to be carried out in a few thousand hectares, which were excluded from EIS 2014. And that's not all: Morris wants the government to consider how future dramatic changes in oil prices can affect the project's profitability.
Ignoring all this violates the National Environmental Policy Act. This was the argument put forward by the applicants – the Indigenous Environmental Network (IEN) and the North Coast Rivers Alliance – in March 2017 when they filed this claim with the Federal Court in Montana. They celebrate the decision of the judge.
"This is a gain for Lakota, the Oceti Sakowin and other tribal nations, for the water and for the sanctity of Mother Earth," said Ien Executive Director Tom Goldtooth in a press release. "This decision confirms what we have always said: Trump's approval of this pipeline was illegal, violated environmental laws, and relied on false facts."
The court had already determined that the project did not properly assess the environmental impact. Last year, the Nebraska Public Commission approved a new route. This is the icing on the cake. We have to wait and see how the Trump administration responds.
One thing is certain: The indigenous leaders who have challenged this project for 10 years will not easily withdraw. They were done.