Home / WorldTech / The real reason you shouldn’t rely on wireless charging

The real reason you shouldn’t rely on wireless charging

I love when people go out and actually test it The hardware we rely on every day. This is why I̵

7;ve spent way too many hours at Wirecutter doing file transfer tests for routers, and I love the latest analysis from Lifehacker alum Eric Ravenscraft which uncovered some major issues with setting up your phone’s wireless charging – issues we were about Probably everyone has thought about one point or another, but never bet numbers.

The evaluation seems so easy that I am surprised I have never seen it before. Eric has teamed up with the Repair Rights Assistants at iFixit find out How much power a typical wireless charger consumes over the significantly longer time that is likely to be needed to spice up your smartphone. He then carried out the same assessment for a standard charging cable and a power supply unit.

The results? Eric writes:

“Charging the phone from completely dead to 100% with a cord took an average of 14.26 watt hours (Wh). Using a wireless charger took an average of 21.01 Wh. That adds up to just over 47% more power for the convenience of not plugging in a cord. In other words, when wirelessly charging, the phone had to work harder, generate more heat, and use more energy to fill the same size battery. “

Eric also found that the positioning of his phone on a wireless charger affected the number of watt hours it took to fully charge his phone. This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to you: if you’re a bit sloppy about putting your device down, aren’t aligning the coils as well as you could, so it will take you more watt hours to charge your device. If your wireless charger is designed in such a way that it is hard to miss the coils when you put your phone on the charger, you will likely charge more efficiently.

As Eric claims, wireless charging will still be inefficient in most scenarios. And the charger itself also uses electricity: around 0.25 watts per hour, even if your phone isn’t on it at all.

However, don’t throw these wireless chargers away yet

Should you replace all of your wireless chargers with cables? If you need the fastest charge you can get it wouldn’t hurt. As Nick Guy wrote for wire cutter last year:

“Qi chargers are slower than wired chargers, period.

The fastest chargers we measured in our tests charged a fully discharged iPhone XR to just 50 percent battery capacity in an hour, about half the speed of a wired charger. However, any wireless charger can fully charge any phone overnight. That’s why I use one on my bedside table too. If I wake up in the middle of the night and want to check my phone (bad habit, I know) I don’t have to worry about waking my partner up when I try to plug my phone back in. “

And if you only care about energy savings – say all LED light bulbs – wired charging is the way to go, writes Android Central Jerry Hildenbrand::

“The too long unread explanation is that the most efficient way to charge your phone is the slowest: a simple USB-A 5 volt 1 amp charger coupled with a short and sturdy cable that goes directly to your phone connected. It’s also a method that most people will never use because it’s very slow and speed and convenience are a factor. “

I think this is the approach you should take as it is important to be aware of the power you are using – especially when thinking about the bigger picture. Use a wireless charger over a wired charger for your phone will not affect your electricity bill to a noticeable degree. Go to your favorite fast food place, and without a side dish of fries You got covered easily what you would have paid for a more inefficient wireless charger.

Anyway if everyone We started using a wireless charger and then we all contribute to a huge consumption of resources to provide a little more convenience as we don’t have to plug anything in to charge. Literally, that’s the only benefit to wireless charging right now: it’s slower, more inefficient, but you don’t have to plug in a cable – a process that usually takes just a few seconds or about as difficult as throwing your recyclables in a blue container instead of a black one.

I wouldn’t go throw Take out your wireless charger as it would probably waste so many resources, if not more simply with the charger. However, the inefficiencies of wireless charging should be considered in the future. As newer and better wireless chargers hit the market, you might want to stick to the cord if it isn’t a burden – like when you’re at your desk or about to go to bed – and use wireless charging in a few moments when you need additional convenience or otherwise not be able to exchange the charging technology, e.g. B. the stylish new wireless charging setup in your car.

And while you’re at it, do it too Really Do you still need to charge your phone all the time? Instead of continuously charging from 80 to 100 percent, keep your phone off the charger until you’re ready for the day (or you really need more battery for a future trip you’re planning). Every little bit helps.

Source link