قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / LifeStyle / Toronto rejects some of Sidewalk Labs' smart neighborhood ideas

Toronto rejects some of Sidewalk Labs' smart neighborhood ideas



The technical assessment divided the four-volume MIDP into 160 different proposals. Sixteen of these proposals have been labeled "unsupportive," which means "new solutions need to be explored," Waterfront Toronto said in a discussion guide that will inform a second round of the public consultation.

The organization rejected an "efficient" and "ultra-efficient" living concept that would have been around seven percent smaller than the corresponding "standard unit" from Sidewalk. The proposed houses would have used multipurpose furniture, such as height-adjustable benches that could serve as desks or shelves, and flexible walls that could shrink and expand spaces. Sidewalk believed that eating together and working together could work in addition to a combination of internal and external storage services.

 Sidewalk Labs "data-caption =" Sidewalk Labs "data-credit =" Sidewalk Labs "" data-credit-link-back = "" data-dam-provider = "" data-local-id = "local-1[ads1]-1087878-1582301278670" data-media-id = "ac2f1bde-ee8b-44e1-9289-35473939761f" data-original-url = "https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images / 2020-02 / 3f5b4250-54c4-11ea-bbd7-67c4d2ffe990 "data-title =" Sidewalk Labs "src =" https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?resize=2000%2C2000%2Cshrink&image_uri=https% 3A% 2F% 2Fs.yimg.com% 2Fos% 2Fcreatr-uploaded-images% 2F2020-02% 2F3f5b4250-54c4 -11ea-bbd7-67c4d2ffe990 & client = a1acac3e1b3290917d92 & Signature = 1d28aa670816df09292 929 "Toronto with support" common building equipment wants 40 percent of quayside houses below the market price - of these apartments, according to the MIDP, the average "efficient" unit would be 578 square feet compared to the average "standard" vo n 638 square feet. </p>
<p>  Waterfront Toronto also threw a systematic categorization that would allow buildings to contain "a changing mix" of residential, commercial, and industrial spaces. Alphabet wanted to move away from one-way zones and instead introduce a "digital building system". The approach would measure noise, air pollution and other forms of general nuisance by its occupants. For this to work, Sidewalk Labs wanted to reduce the Toronto building code system in Quayside to nine "neutral use" categories. Anything that fell into these categories, including one-person homes, restaurants, and shops, could occupy a room, provided it didn't violate the building's predefined levels of harassment. </p>
<blockquote class=

Alphabet considered a "lantern forest" in which eight people were used. Meter-high kiosks clumped together like trees to protect people from the wind.

Other rejections fell in front of Quaysides brick buildings. Sidewalk Labs had prototyped a special "raincoat" awning that could protect nearby pedestrians from rain, wind, and blinding sunlight. The company believed that they could be attached to a single building and tied with peg-like posts, or placed like a canopy between two buildings. Similarly, the design of the MIDP suggested "fanshell" huts for parks and other outdoor areas. They would be available in two versions – a "shell" close to the floor or a "fan" that sprouts up like an umbrella – and made from an origami-style fabric that can be folded and packed away if necessary.

Alphabet also considered a "lantern forest" concept using eight meter high kiosks that were clumped together like trees to protect people from the wind. They could be used in open spaces exposed to the elements, or strategically placed in so-called "urban canyons" that create narrow wind tunnels between shops and homes. However, Waterfront Toronto rejected the concepts of raincoat, fanshell and lantern forest. "We are excited to continue to seek solutions for outdoor comfort in our Quayside building designs, which we will continue to review with Waterfront Toronto," said Sidewalk Labs spokeswoman Keerthana Rang.

 Sidewalk Labs "data-caption =" Sidewalk Labs "data-credit =" Sidewalk Labs "data-credit-link-back =" "data-dam-provider =" "data-local-id =" local-1-5247092-1582301734343 "data-media-id =" af955527-6b76-4c65-ab5d-8dc95bdb8eb0 "data-original-url =" https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/ 2020-02 / 53637960-54c5 -11ea-951f-e6b5297cc6cb "data-title =" Sidewalk Labs "src =" https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?resize=2000%2C2000%2Cshrink&image_uri=https%3A % 2F% 2Fs.yimg. com% 2Fos% 2Fcreatr-uploaded-pictures% 2F2020-02% 2F53637960-54c5-11ea-951f-e6b5297cc6cb & client = a1acac3e1b3290917d92 & signature = 6f9ea0c71379e5470ab32e83m2ents8systemsystem network. The company said the heating network could be connected to the Ashbridges Bay sewage treatment plant in Toronto - the second largest of its kind in Canada - which it claimed had "thermal energy potential" to heat approximately 35 quays. "</p>
<p>  The Alphabet subsidiary also proposed a two-part system for processing food waste in the neighborhood. First, a building in Quayside would separate the garbage and send it to a" neighborhood collection point ". An external facility would then remove any contaminants and waste with anaerobic digesters – microorganisms that can decompose biodegradable waste – into biogas Waterfront Toronto refused to connect the sewage treatment plant in Ashbridges Bay and the use of anaerobic digestion for food waste, because according to <em> The Star </em> not for </p><div><script async src=

Most of the other refusals related to funding. Waterfront Toronto questioned the suggestion that it would have to make recurring payments to subsidize advanced infrastructure, including the heating network. It was also inconsistent with funding, the one for a quaysi de Neighborhood Association, or with the idea that 5 percent of the homes should be available to owners for partial rent and ownership through a shared equity program.

However, these setbacks are overshadowed by the preliminary approvals in the technical assessment. There were 92 solutions that Waterfront Toronto would support if all of the financing and delivery was done by the private sector. The organization approved another 24 with a promise to support additional government funding. The last 17 were solutions it would support while pushing for relevant policy changes and regulatory reforms. The 144 approved measures include solid wood buildings, roofs covered with solar panels and / or vegetation, incentives to own electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, intelligent waste chutes and the heating network.

 Sidewalk Labs "data-caption =" Sidewalk Labs "data-credit =" Sidewalk Labs "data-credit-link-back =" "data-dam-provider =" "data-local-id =" local-2-3746384-1582301995949 "data-media-id =" 73ec814f-f128-4a6f-864d-be4795271595 "data-original-url =" https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/ 2020-02 / ef047a40-54c5-11ea-bf3d-53de92c854c1 "Data -title =" Sidewalk Labs "src =" https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?resize=2000%2C2000%2Cshrink&image_uri=https%3A % 2F% 2Fs.yimg.com% 2Fos% 2Fcreatr-uploaded- images% 2F2020-02% 2Fef047a40-54c5-11ea-bf3d-53de92c854c1 & client = a1acac3e1b3290917d92 & signature = 1ab098cf37f532cbe72c09b09 ">. Tha t said we are still in active negotiations with Waterfront Toronto and are still considering what will be possible on the quayside, "said Rank <a href= today in a tweet .

These "agreed changes" probably refer to the "threshold problems" that Waterfront Toronto had when it published the MIDP. The three government's biggest concern was Sidewalk's intention to expand beyond Quayside with a 62-acre river district that would consist of five neighborhoods: Keating East, Villiers West, Villiers East, Polson Quay, and McCleary. Google also asked to be the main developer at Villiers West and to build a new Canadian Google headquarters on the 8 hectare property.

In an open letter, Waterfront Toronto said the planned expansion was premature. "Waterfront Toronto must first see its goals and objectives on the quayside before deciding whether to collaborate in other areas," said Steve Diamond, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Waterfront Toronto. "Even then, we would only promote the full cooperation and support of the city of Toronto, especially when it comes to urban properties." It also rejected Sidewalk Labs' proposal to become a lead developer and reiterated that it would go through a "competitive public procurement process" instead.

Sidewalk Labs agreed to all of Toronto's demands. This means that the evaluation process can continue for the time being. However, the project has divided citizens who want change, but are wary of Sidewalk's connections to Google. Waterfront Toronto has until the end of the year to decide once and for all whether the project should continue. Until then, it is likely that Sidewalk will have to continue negotiating its master plan and making compromises.

"It won't be an easy negotiation, but I believe there is a will on both sides for it to work," said Sheldon Levy. A member of the six-member committee that reviewed the technical assessment said in a letter to George Zegarac, a colleague and CEO of Waterfront Toronto.

Update 2/21/20 12:10 PM: Sidewalk Labs comment added that many of the "non-supportive" decisions were the result of the "threshold issues" that were negotiated and resolved last year.


Source link